Skip to content

Conversation

haja-fgabriel
Copy link

@haja-fgabriel haja-fgabriel commented May 5, 2025

In our production environment, we use Python 3.8, and this library would really help us in our work. We can’t easily switch to a newer Python version.

Let me know if you have Python 3.9+ behavior apart from union type notations.

Changes done:

  • removed Python 3.10 style of union types
  • removed parenthesized context managers specific to Python 3.10

@haja-fgabriel haja-fgabriel marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2025 08:05
@haja-fgabriel haja-fgabriel changed the title [WIP] Lower requirement to Python 3.8 Lower requirement to Python 3.8 May 7, 2025
@haja-fgabriel
Copy link
Author

haja-fgabriel commented May 7, 2025

Tested with the Jupyter notebook on Python 3.8.10 in a Codespace environment; after fixing the path to the test files, works smoothly.
@uhermjakob @berquist @thammegowda @joelthe1 it would be awesome if my modifications would make it into production :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant